85% of Failed AI Projects Blame Data Quality. Only 12% of Companies are Ready.
Your model isn’t underperforming because the architecture is wrong — it’s underperforming because the data feeding it isn’t AI-ready. Gartner found 85% of failed AI projects cite poor data quality as the root cause, and only 12% of organizations have data good enough to support AI applications.
In-House AI Hiring Costs $300K+
and 6 Months You don’t Have.
Senior AI/ML total comp now runs $220K–$550K, before recruiting fees, before ramp time, before the risk that your AI strategy shifts mid-search. A Hurix engineering pod trades that fixed bet for a predictable monthly cost.
85% of failed AI projects cite data quality*
12% of orgs have AI-ready data*
60% of unready AI projects abandoned by 2026*
85% of failed AI projects blame data quality
The problem
Why do your AI models underperform in production?
Usually not the model. Inconsistent labels, no human-in-the-loop review, and data that was never validated for the use case — AI faithfully reproduces those flaws at scale instead of correcting for them.
Is your institution struggling to keep up with new course launches? From curriculum design and assessments, to course creation, we transform your courseware into a scalable, personalized learning ecosystem. Partner with us to upgrade your curriculum without requiring a full rebuild every time.